Quantcast
Channel: Recent Criminal Law posts - Justia BlawgSearch.com
Viewing all 72262 articles
Browse latest View live

DUI Charge With Child in A Car

$
0
0
DUI Charge With Child in A CarA Greenacres woman is facing DUI and child neglect charges today after police say her teenage daughter was in the vehicle with her as she drove impaired.Greenacres police arrested Martina Cecilia Ramirez, 45, in the area of South Jog Road and 10th Avenue North Wednesday night. She is being held at the Palm Beach County Jail this afternoon in lieu of $3,000.During the traffic stop, the affidavit says Ramirez told the officer she had been drinking coffee but not alcohol. She pointed to a 20 oz. Styrofoam coffee cup with a white lid and straw, which was sitting in a cup holder. She hesitated when the officer asked to see the cup, but eventually handed it over.“It was not filled with coffee,” the officer wrote, “but a clear liquid that had a strong odor of an unknown alcoholic beverage coming from it.”The affidavit says Ramirez had a blood alcohol level of 0.238 — nearly three times the legal limit of .08 — and she was unable to accurately complete several roadside tasks. The officer wrote that she told him she could not close her eyes without falling because of the drinks that she had.Ramirez’ 15-year-old daughter was in the vehicle when this all happened. Full story, sourceDUI Child EndangermentIn 2010, 17 percent of the children age 14 and younger who were killed in motor vehicle crashes were killed in alcohol-impaired crashes.1 Of the 211 children 0 to 14 years old who were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes during 2010, 131 (62 percent) of those killed were passengers in vehicles with drivers had a BAC level of .08 or higher.2 A child in a vehicle with a drinking driver is not only at risk from the impaired driver, but also from the lack of safety restraint use (like a seat belt or child safety seat), as drinking drivers are much less likely to make sure a child is properly restrained. Specifically, in fatal crashes, sober drivers had restrained their children 30.5 percent of the time, compared with only 18 percent for drinking drivers.3 MADD believes that driving under the influence of alcohol or other drugs is criminal and irresponsible. Having a child in the car elevates this criminal act to child abuse. Black’s Law Dictionary defines child abuse as: When a child's parent or custodian, by reason of cruelty, mental incapacity, immorality or depravity, is unfit to properly care for him or her, or neglects or refuses to provide necessary physical, affectional, medical, surgical or institutional care for him or her or is under such improper care or control as to endanger his or her morals or health. Clearly, driving under the influence with a child in the vehicle – child endangerment – is “improper care... so as to endanger his or her morals or health” and thus constitutes child abuse. Thus, additional sanctions should be placed on those who drive under the influence with a child in the vehicle – regular sanctions and treatment are not enough. 43 states and the District of Columbia have laws enhancing penalties for those who drive drunk with a child passenger in a vehicle. The laws vary widely in severity and definition of a child passenger. For example in New York it is a felony to drive drunk with a child passenger under the age of 16. Whereas in Wisconsin, the same offense is a misdemeanor.DUI Child Endangerment Laws in FloridaIf passenger is under 18: first offense: Up to nine months in prison and a fine range from $1,000 to $2,000. An ignition interlock is required for six months too. Second offense: up to 12 months in prison and $2,000-$4,000 fine. An ignition interlocks is required for at least two years. FL ST § 316.193 (4) Source: http://www.madd.org/laws/child-endangerment.htmlIt is not illegal to drink and drive in Florida, so long as your blood alcohol content (BAC) is not over .08 or your normal faculties are not impaired. At the law firm of Andrew D. Stine, P.A., in West Palm Beach, we advise our clients to neither blow into a breathalyzer machine nor do a roadside test. Why give evidence to the state if you don't have to?If you have submitted to a breathalyzer test and failed, that is not the end of your case. The Intoxilzer 5,000 and Intoxilzer 8,000 breathalyzer machines used to measure BAC in Florida have significant problems. If you have an expert witness and an experienced attorney who can challenge the accuracy of the machine in court, the BAC evidence may be thrown out. DUI/DWI Lawyer Andrew Stine has obtained not-guilty verdicts due to machine failure for clients who have had blood alcohol levels of .229 and .227.The most important thing in DUI/DWI cases is early intervention by your attorney. This preliminary involvement will help you avoid the consequences of a conviction, which are very serious in Florida. We will also represent you at your hearing before the Florida Department of Motor Vehicles in order to protect your right to drive.Free consultation 24/7: Call West Palm Beach criminal defense lawyer Andrew D. Stine, P.A. at (561) 832-1170. Se habla español.Distributed by Viestly

Book by J. L. Hardee Sheds Light on Jury Deliberation Process

$
0
0
Justice or Injustice? What really Happens in a Court Jury Room is a book by J.L. Hardee that every American citizen should have to read. It tells the story of a young man thrown into the justice system as a juror with very little prior knowledge of the law. The interesting concept behind this book is [...]

CA3: Police reliance on a prosecutor’s legal advice on PC to arrest is gives qualified immunity

$
0
0
Police reliance on a prosecutor’s legal advice on probable cause to arrest is entitled to qualified immunity. Fiore v. City of Bethlehem, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1459 (3d Cir. January 18, 2013).* In this § 1983 false arrest case, defendants did not violate plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment rights by arrest and seizure of a car for a hit-and-run where the car well matched the description given by the victims. There was probable cause. Robinson v. Cook, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1532 (1st Cir. January 23, 2013).* Defendant’s truck was illegally parked near the visitor center of Yosemite National Park, and a park ranger approached to get defendant to move it. The smell of marijuana coming from the truck was probable cause more might be found in the truck. United States v. Parker, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8660 (E.D. Cal. January 18, 2013).*

If I have a warrant out for my arrest, should I have an attorney with me when I turn myself in?

$
0
0
Free legal answers from attorneys - I found out there is a warrant out for my arrest for assault and after a bar fight but no one was arrested that night.

Harvard Law Meets an Innocent Man

$
0
0
By John J. Corrigan, Lecturer on Law, Harvard Law School My seminar on criminal prosecution, for law students working essentially as Assistant District Attorneys in their third year, is a self-selected group, drawn towards public service. Many are future prosecutors, some future defense attorneys and some plan on running for public office themselves. They are enjoyable to work with and have already moved outside of the academic comfort zone and rarified air of Harvard Law School by choosing a clinical experience. They spend their days in court, and our class meets in the evening. It's a discussion course. We explore, sometimes heatedly, the range of issues prosecutors must face: judgments about which cases to bring, what kinds of punishments to seek, how to prepare witnesses, how to spot exculpatory evidence, etc. But no class discussion matches the "shock and awe" approach of meeting an innocent man who did nearly two decades in prison for horrible rapes that he didn't commit. Students forget a great deal of what I say in class. However, none forget the soul-searing experience of meeting Dennis Maher and hearing his story. Dennis is a truly remarkable man who has shared his story with my students year after year. When I first asked Dennis to come and speak four years ago he was joined by the prosecutor from his 1983 trial, J.W. Carney, who eventually helped Dennis reverse the conviction. Students - who have been told only just before the class that the guest will be someone involved with the prosecution of the case - are generally dumbstruck. One year, a student sobbed softly throughout his entire presentation. Maher's story is Kafkaesque. DNA evidence was not introduced into Massachusetts' courtrooms until 10 years after his initial convictions, and he was still hitting dead ends as a pro se litigant. With help from lawyers from the Innocence Project and the New England Innocence Project, some nine years later still, "lost" files - including evidence that could be tested for DNA - were located and proved his innocence. The Maher case is also a stark lesson in the way mistakes are made. Although there was some police misconduct in a third sexual assault case brought after Maher's first two charges, two of the three crimes he was wrongfully convicted of involved a simple mistaken identification. Even with highly competent, well-intentioned prosecutors, things can go wrong. I don't expect my students to achieve perfection in their legal careers. But I do expect them to acknowledge the potential for failure within the criminal justice system and to remember, through Dennis' cautionary tale, just how much is at stake.Watch Dennis speaking at a University of Massachusetts event.

What is the possibility of not getting jail time for my second DUI in 2 years?

$
0
0
Free legal answers from attorneys - Not much to add here Didn't get jail for my first offense, just wondering if I'll get jail for second offense.

If a store forgives me for stealing something can I still be arrested for it?

$
0
0
Free legal answers from attorneys - The security guard at the store caught me for stealing candy. I went into the back office with him and the manager and

IN: Photographs of defendant's car didn't objectively support state's justification for window tint stop

$
0
0
The court of appeals looks at the photographs of defendant’s car and concludes the window tint justification for the stop was objectively unreasonable, and the motion to suppress should have been granted. Sanders v. State, 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 20 (January 22, 2013).* Defendant was arrested for OWI, but the officer knew defendant and that he was a suspect in several burlaries. On this record, there was a fair probability defendant had evidence of burglaries in the car. Thus, Gant was no impediment to searching the trunk. State v. Lefler, 2013 Wisc. App. LEXIS 56 (January 23, 2013).* Defendant was carrying a gun in his waistband at a racetrack. Security there was provided by private security and sheriff’s deputies. A tipster told a security officer that defendant had a gun, and defendant was near a bathroom near a large crowd including children. “Mr. Johnson walked by Mayes and intentionally gave him a ‘shoulder bump,’ allowing him to feel a gun in Mayes’s front waistband. Based on his experience searching for weapons at night clubs, Mr. Johnson felt what he believed to be an automatic. He proceeded to move Mayes away from the bathroom, search him, secure the loaded gun, and place Mayes in handcuffs.” Defendant was taken to a sheriff’s deputy and turned over. He was a felon in possession, and this was purely a private search. United States v. Mayes, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9471 (D. S.C. January 24, 2013).*

Need An Office?

$
0
0
If you are an Arizona lawyer in need of an office, give me a call or send me an email. Beginning on February 1, 2013, we will have space available in our suite.

Commentary From Arkansas

$
0
0
Today's Baxter Bulletin publishes Steve Barnes' column, "Will Beebe remarks spark capitol punishment action?" Gov. Beebe’s declaration, a few days ago, that he would sign a bill abolishing the death penalty in Arkansas in the (highly improbable) event such legislation...

Brockton Man Arrested, Charged With Home Invasion In Plymouth District Court

$
0
0
According to a report in the Brockton Enterprise Paul Perelli met up with defendant Eddy Monteiro, a Brockton, Massachusetts resident at Perelli's home in Marshfield. It is alleged that Monteiro owed Perelli one hundred fifty dollars and wanted to settle...

Woman Accused of Murdering Boyfriend with Breasts

Woman Accused of Murdering Boyfriend with Breasts

Ex-CIA Officer Sentenced to 30 Months for Torture Leak

$
0
0
A federal judge in Virginia has accepted the plea agreement of former CIA agent John Kiriakou and sentenced him to 30 months in prison for leaking the name of a CIA operative who participated in the... [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

Friday Open Thread

$
0
0
Here's an open thread, all topics welcome. [[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

TX: In a civil forfeiture, the defense apparently must prove a negative on summary judgment

$
0
0
On defense summary judgment in a forfeiture case, the defense has to prove a negative, that the officers did not have “a reasonable belief that the property had or would have a substantial connection with illegal activity.” Grant of summary judgment reversed. State v. Ninety Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-five Dollars and No Cents in United States Currency ($90,235), 11-0642 (Tex. January 25, 2013).* This is the gobbledygook of the month: Bueno’s only summary judgment evidence was his affidavit. We need not address the affidavit’s weight in light of Bueno’s status as an interested witness, because his affidavit was insufficient to support summary judgment regardless of his status. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c) (stating the specific requirements for when summary judgment may be based on the uncontroverted testimonial evidence of an interested witness). The affidavit states, as relevant to any connection between the seized property and illegal drug dealing activities, that (1) the vehicle and money were “acquired legally and lawfully”; and (2) the money represented a partial payment from the sale of his ranch. But the affidavit wholly fails to address whether the officers had a reasonable belief that the property had or would have a substantial connection with illegal activity as pleaded by the State—even assuming Bueno could address what the officers believed and whether their beliefs were reasonable. The affidavit certainly does not conclusively prove that none of them did. And until Bueno conclusively established that none of them had such a belief, the trial court could not have properly granted summary judgment on Bueno’s second ground. The court of appeals erred by holding otherwise. h/t Americans for Forfeiture Reform

Sacharoff on the Relational Nature of Privacy

$
0
0
Laurent Sacharoff (University of Arkansas - School of Law) has posted The Relational Nature of Privacy (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, p. 1249, 2012) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: The hard Fourth Amendment cases, especially...

MN - Report: Hundreds of Sex Offenders Released Before Completing Treatment

$
0
0
Original Article01/24/2013By Steve Tellier Hundreds of convicted sex offenders are ordered to complete treatment while in prison but are released without doing so. And even the Minnesota Department of Corrections admits those convicts are more likely to commit another sexual crime once they're back on the street. "The department is very concerned about the risk of all sex offenders," said Steve Allen, the director of behavioral health sciences at the DOC. That concern was clear in a new DOC report presented to the legislature last week. It states that in Minnesota, there are about 1,800 sex offenders behind bars who are supposed to complete a treatment program before being released. But only one in three ever enter that treatment, let alone complete it. A 2010 DOC report showed those who are released before participating in treatment are about six percent more likely to commit another sexual crime. "That really is a disappointing figure," said Donna Dunn, the executive director of the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault. "We know that sex offender treatment can work and does work. We know that that is something that is incredibly important for offenders to go through. When that doesn't happen, we know that public safety is compromised." The DOC does make sure the most serious offenders are the ones who get spots in the prison treatment program, and the ones who don't are passed on to community-based treatment and supervision after they're released. "The research tells us to put the resources where the risk is," Allen said. The problem is that resources are lacking. "We would need funding to expand our treatment," Allen said. The DOC's budget has recently remained flat, and Gov. Mark Dayton's budget proposal doesn't include any additional cash. "Preventing sexual violence has got to be a priority," Dunn said. The chair of the House Public Safety Finance and Policy committee, Rep. Michael Paymar (DFL-St. Paul), said the legislature is looking for ways to get the DOC more money and resources for offender treatment.© 2006-2013 | Sex Offender Issues

Kansas Death Penalty Conviction Overturned

$
0
0
TheKansas Supreme Court ruling in Kansas v. Cheatham is available in Adobe .pdf format. The Republic posts the AP filing, "Kansas Supreme Court orders new trial for man in 2003 murders, cites ineffective legal counsel." It's written by John Milburn....

What Will Make a California DUI a Felony Charge?

$
0
0
prison.jpg Under most circumstances, driving under the influence (DUI) in California will result in misdemeanor charges being filed against you. Most of the 200,000 people arrested for DUI will be charged with a misdemeanor offense. These are the many people pulled over by a police officer who subsequently smelled alcohol on their breath and conducted a DUI investigation. Under California law, a person is intoxicated if they are driving a vehicle with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .08 or greater. As long as there are no factors that would result in enhanced charges, a person would most likely face nothing more than a misdemeanor charge for their first, second and even their third DUI. However, if you have had three DUI convictions within the ten year look back period from the initial arrest, you will be facing California felony DUI charges with your fourth DUI arrest. If your DUI resulted in injury or death to another person you will face felony DUI charges. The injury can be to a passenger in your vehicle, the driver or passenger in another vehicle or a pedestrian. A DUI with injury is sometimes referred to as a "wobbler" because it can be a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the extent of the injury and the county of the arrest. If your DUI resulted in the death of someone you will be charged with vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated, which is a felony. In these cases, the death will be said to have been caused by ordinary or gross negligence of the intoxicated driver. If the circumstances surrounding the death of another person while you were drunk are egregious enough, you can be charged with second degree murder. In these cases the death will be said to have been caused by malice or malice aforethought -- a conscious disregard for human life. These charges are by far the most severe and are filed against repeat DUI offenders. They are called "Watson murders" because of a 1981 California Supreme Court case that allowed for the crime of second degree murder for repeat drunk drivers who cause a death. Everyone convicted of a DUI in California has to sign or acknowledge being given a Watson advertisement. That acknowledgement essentially states that you acknowledge how dangerous it is to drive under the influence and agree to be charged with murder in California if you kill someone while driving under the influence. Finally, it is also possible for you to be charged with a felony DUI, for even a simple misdemeanor DUI arrest, if you have a prior felony DUI conviction. So, even a simple misdemeanor DUI arrest with no aggravating circumstances will escalate to a felony if you have had a prior felony DUI. A felony DUI with bodily injury comes with stiff penalties, such as two to four years in a California State Prison, fines of up to $5,000, mandated 30 month DUI school and a driver's license suspension of five years. You will also be designated as a habitual traffic offender (HTO) for three years. A vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated will result in fines of up to $10,000 and up to four years in a California State Prison. The facts surrounding your arrest may cause the punishment to escalate. A gross vehicular manslaughter conviction will result in four to ten years in prison. If you are charged with gross vehicular manslaughter and have two or more prior DUI convictions, you could face 15 years to life in prison.
Viewing all 72262 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images