<font style="FONT-SIZE: 12px" face="Arial">Bad cases make bad law, and it seems that any case involving <a href="http://blog.simplejustice.us/2012/03/30/a-blogger-not-like-us.aspx" target=
"">Crystal Cox</a> is, almost by definition, bad. <a href="http://www.popehat.com/2012/03/30/investigative-journalist-crystal-coxs-latest-target-an-enemys-three-year-old-daughter/" target=
"">Bad</a>, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/12/07/investment-firm-awarded-2-5-million-after-being-defamed-by-blogger/" target="">bad</a>, <a href=
"http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/12/business/media/when-truth-survives-free-speech.html?pagewanted=all" target="">bad</a>. Which is why it's painful to see the newest issue raised in one of the
most bizarre cases around, <em>Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox</em> .<br>
<br>
...</font>
↧